Latest study calls for moratorium on COVID-19 gene therapy

The study, led by Philip R. Oldfield, Ph.D., and authored by renowned epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, scrutinizes the safety and regulatory oversight of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. McCullough, who rightfully opposed the COVID-19 vaccine from the beginning, said the vaccine should never have been classified as a traditional vaccine, but rather as gene therapy — a category with far more stringent regulatory requirements.

The study emphasizes the failure of the scientific community to conduct essential testing, such as toxicology, carcinogenicity and long-term safety evaluations. Most alarmingly, it points to an unsettling lack of understanding regarding the long-term effects of the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine.

“The truth is becoming more obvious,” said Oldfield in a statement. “As more evidence is accumulating, we are seeing undeniable signs that the risks may far outweigh the benefits of these vaccines.”

The study’s criticism extends beyond the vaccine’s classification. It highlights several key concerns, including the absence of critical testing during clinical trials. Key factors such as the amount and variability of the spike protein produced in vaccine recipients were not measured adequately, and placebo groups were unblinded prematurely, undermining the integrity of long-term safety and efficacy data.

Gene therapy turned out to be genetic weaponry

The study also references a troubling report by the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which shows over 19,000 deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines, a figure that far surpasses any other vaccine’s adverse events in recent history. This is particularly concerning given the typical thresholds for removing vaccines from the market. For instance, the Rotashield vaccine, linked to just 15 deaths, was swiftly withdrawn. In contrast, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine remains widely available despite a far higher mortality rate in its initial months of use.

The authors argue that the regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), failed to address these concerns, pointing to a “widespread regulatory capture” that discouraged proper oversight. “Public health agencies could have acted responsibly and issued sound, scientifically-backed recommendations,” said Dr. McCullough. “But instead, they chose to ignore mounting safety signals.”

Recent research has also raised alarms about the neurological risks associated with this genetic weaponry. A study published in Cell Host & Microbe in late November found that the persistent presence of spike proteins in the brain could lead to lasting neurological damage. Experts like Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology, are particularly alarmed by the increasing number of individuals showing signs of severe neurological diseases and rapid dementia following injection.

Dr. McCullough’s study also notes that the spike protein produced by this gene therapy is widely distributed throughout the body and infiltrates vital organs, including the liver, spleen, ovaries and adrenal glands. He warns that no comprehensive studies have been conducted on how this protein interacts with the human body over the long term. This raises concerns about the vaccine’s potential to cause damage to multiple organ systems, especially since the body may continue to produce spike proteins long after injection.

Despite these mounting safety concerns, Pfizer and other manufacturers have been granted legal immunity from liability, making it difficult for injured individuals to seek justice. This liability shield has incentivized vaccine companies to downplay the risks.

How many more voices need to be raised, before this biological weapon system is shut down?

Many experts and organizations are now questioning why the mRNA vaccines are still in use despite these glaring issues. The World Council for Health, Doctors for COVID Ethics and even Florida’s Surgeon General have publicly supported halting the distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines until more comprehensive safety studies are conducted.

“There is no justification for continuing this gene therapy experiment on a global scale,” said Christof Plothe, D.O., a member of the World Council for Health’s steering committee. “We still don’t know the long-term effects, and we need to stop this rollout immediately.”

As one of the study’s authors put it, “Given all the available evidence, there should be a moratorium on all mRNA injections until we have a clear understanding of their safety profile.”

How many more voices need to be raised, and how much more evidence needs to emerge before we pause the use of these “vaccines” in order to protect public health? When will they be properly classified as genetic weaponry?

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• JPAnds.org [PDF]
• MedAlerts.org
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org [PDF]

The WHO’s actions during the COVID-19 scandal, driven by corporate interests, have led to an unprecedented assault on individual liberties and societal well-being. Individualized treatment was ditched for a one-size-fits all set of public health mandates that exacerbated human suffering. However, merely ending a relationship with WHO does not do anyone justice. A sovereign United States must go to war with the World Health Organization and fight back against an insidious global health industry and biosecurity state that thrives on power, profit and human exploitation.

Dismantling the WHO is just the beginning; we must confront the biosecurity state in domestic healthcare systems

While disentangling from the WHO may feel like a victory, it is a hollow one unless it is part of a broader overhaul of the entire global public health infrastructure that thrives on hysteria, fraud and unlawful mandates. The WHO is but a cog in a machine that values corporate profits and political control over the health and dignity of ordinary people. It is a tool of biosecurity agendas and profit-driven policies. Simply leaving the WHO will not end this toxic system. This toxic system of human exploitation is embedded into Western healthcare. We need to break away from predatory vaccine experimentation and infectious disease fearmongering, and find an exit strategy from the entire corrupt public health industry.

In 2020, the WHO didn’t just fail the world — it became an active participant facilitating medical fraud, medical error and wrongful death. At the behest of wealthy sponsors and political elites, the organization oversaw policies that disproportionately affected the most vulnerable populations. The behemoth pushed for lockdowns that decimated economies, exacerbated poverty and pushed millions more into food insecurity. The WHO’s reckless actions forced children out of school, denied medical care to those with non-COVID-related ailments and deepened the debt crises of developing nations. Perhaps most egregiously, the organization facilitated an unconscionable transfer of wealth from the most disadvantaged to the pharmaceutical and corporate elites.

This wasn’t an unfortunate mistake — it was a calculated, intentional response to a manufactured crisis. Instead of focusing on protecting the most vulnerable, the WHO facilitated a global power grab, censoring dissent and offering unprecedented privileges to its corporate sponsors. Fostering a climate of fear and control, the WHO set the stage for future exploitation. The result? A generation of young people with stolen opportunities, impoverished nations saddled with insurmountable debt, billions of dollars in profit funneled to pharmaceutical giants and a holocaust ignored.

The WHO’s failure isn’t just a case of poor leadership or bad decisions — it’s a reflection of deep-rooted structural corruption. The organization’s original mission, established in 1946, was to ensure health equity and protect the world’s most vulnerable. But over time, it has become a grotesque shadow of that ideal. Its executives, insulated by lavish salaries and funded by the very corporations it claims to regulate, are increasingly detached from the people they were supposed to serve. This corruption is not incidental — it is intrinsic to the WHO’s very existence.

Davos elite will continue to threaten human freedom and health, while pretending to keep people safe

It is a tragic farce to watch WHO leaders attend elite summits in Davos while millions around the world suffer from the totalitarian policies they impose. These elites are not working for the global population — they are working for the interests of multinational corporations, international finance and the political elites who profit from a system of global control.

Take, for example, the WHO’s recent push to amend the International Health Regulations (IHR) under the guise of pandemic preparedness. These amendments, championed by corporate interests and political elites, would give the WHO even more sweeping powers to dictate national health policies during future crises. The WHO, once a facilitator of global health equity, has become an instrument for a biosecurity agenda that prioritizes global control and private profits over the health and freedom of individuals.

The WHO’s hand is forced by the pharmaceutical industry and the wealthy figures who look to capitalize from vaccine investments. The more money these companies pump into the organization, the more influence they wield over its policies. And the results are devastating. The WHO’s advisory guidelines on things like abortion, gender identity, vaccine skepticism and climate change reflect this unholy alliance. Its push for universal abortion access up until birth, no questions asked, and its endorsement of extreme gender ideology, show a stunning disregard for biological truth and basic human dignity.

The WHO is merely one part of a much larger, systemic problem. The global health industry, in which the WHO plays a pivotal role, is increasingly dominated by a commodity-based approach that uses healthcare as a weapon. Market exclusivity and other profit motives restrict access to healthcare. A corrupt insurance industry eliminates alternative, holistic and individualized approaches to healthcare and stops the progression of healing modalities from being accepted. From Big Pharma to the private donors funding international health initiatives, this industry is driven by the bottom line — whether that means selling dangerous vaccines, controlling supply chains or pushing austerity measures on poor nations. To reform healthcare and restore trust in medical professionals, WHO must be dismantled and its sordid influences must be removed from every healthcare systems.

Sources include:

• Expose-News.com
• NaturalNews.com
• Open.who.int
• Brownstone.org

If the brave and the bold had not steadfastly resisted the propaganda and the totalitarianism, then the world would be in a much different place today – oppressed by vaccine passports, endless booster requirements, slavery and death. Without the growing health freedom movement, populations would be subject to the constant threat of societal segregation, loss of parental rights, censorship, intimidation and discrimination in the workplace, and intellectual suicide. In fact, America could very easily be dealing with quarantine camps if it weren’t for widespread awareness and resistance to the medical tyranny.

Quarantine camps were originally planned for U.S. communities

As medical tyranny was placated in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) rolled out a series of totalitarian policies that fundamentally altered daily life, ranging from insidious mask mandates, social distancing insanity to discriminatory business closures, travel restrictions, plexiglass barriers and societal segregation for those who did not submit to deadly medical experiments.

However, these measures, which were already draconian in their impact, were only a fraction of what was originally planned. An ignored CDC document reveals that a far more extreme and authoritarian approach was in the works — one that would have involved widespread isolation of individuals who were deemed “high-risk” in government-controlled quarantine camps. These quarantine camps were to be erected out of existing communities. People’s homes and property rights were to be seized, as families were set to be separated and cordoned off in different homes in the community.

In July 2020, the CDC quietly released the plan titled, “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.” This document, which remained on the CDC’s public website until March 2023, outlined a disturbing proposal to create nationwide isolation camps for individuals deemed “vulnerable.” This plan would have seen people forcibly separated from their families, their communities and even their religious practices, all in the name of “public health and safety.”

The plan — never fully implemented but disturbingly detailed — called for the forced relocation of “high-risk” individuals to what were effectively quarantine zones, under the CDC’s concept of “shielding.” These “green zones,” as the document described them, would isolate older adults and people with serious underlying health conditions, physically separating them from the general population to prevent them from coming into contact with individuals who were deemed “low-risk.”

The CDC’s proposal was not limited to households but extended to entire neighborhoods and even camps or sectors, which would have been scattered across the country. These camps were to house up to 50 high-risk individuals per zone, with strict controls over movement and a single-entry point for food and supplies. The plan even discussed the need for dedicated staff to monitor these zones and ensure that individuals adhered to strict isolation protocols.

Architects behind quarantine camps must be exposed

While the CDC stressed that the “shielding approach” was not meant to be coercive, it quickly acknowledged the inherent psychological dangers of such isolation. The document warned that being cut off from family, faith and community could lead to emotional distress, depression and even suicide among those confined in the zones. In fact, the CDC outlined procedures for preventing suicides and ensuring that the mentally ill in isolation were assigned caregivers to avoid neglect and abuse.

Perhaps most shockingly, the document included no provisions for legal appeals or any form of due process for those who were deemed “high-risk.” There was no mention of legal counsel or any recourse for individuals who disagreed with being forcibly removed from their homes or communities. The plan essentially outlined how individuals could be imprisoned without trial or representation under the guise of protecting them from a virus.

The document’s language is chilling, with deranged government officials assuming absolute control over individuals’ movements, families and rights. It suggests a system where the government could decide who lives and who is isolated based on public health determinations. This raises profound ethical questions about the role of government in dictating personal lives, as well as the capacity for abuse when such powers are unchecked.

The CDC’s quarantine camp plan, had it succeeded, would have been the ultimate realization of a medical police state. The removal of this plan from public view in 2023 does not erase the truth of its existence, the planning behind it, or the chilling implications of what could have been. Full disclosure of these maniacal plans must be made available to the public, and the architects must be publicly shamed, so that this never comes close to happening again.

Sources include:

• Brownstone.org
• Web.archive.org
• AHRP.org

This new syndrome comes on the heels of a global mRNA vaccine experiment that destroyed human blood composition and quality and exacerbated inflammation throughout the body. This experiment infiltrated the human race with foreign spike proteins that caused widespread blood clotting disorders, myocarditis and pericarditis, while interfering with normal, healthy protein and hormone production of the cell. One study found an increased risk of epilepsy, severe allergic shock, myocarditis and appendicitis in children injected with COVID-19 vaccines, indicating systemic blood and immunological damage.

AHA won’t address the causes of this new disease

The AHA’s announcement raises significant questions about the causes behind such a widespread health crisis. According to the AHA’s recent statistical update, nearly one-third of American adults are believed to have multiple risk factors contributing to CKM syndrome, including obesity, Type 2 diabetes and kidney disease. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) corroborates these findings, noting that 90 percent of U.S. adults meet the criteria for CKM syndrome at stage 1 or higher. The lack of historical data — CKM syndrome was only introduced last fall — adds a layer of complexity to understanding the implications of this diagnosis.

The study highlights significant demographic disparities, with older adults, men and black individuals facing the greatest risk. However, the study does not address any environmental causes for this condition. The elephant in the room is the mRNA vaccine experiment, which harms all of these physiological processes mentioned in the new diagnostic guidelines. For instance, an Oxford study revealed that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are the sole cause of heart inflammation and heart failure in children.

New disease label mirrors the damage done by global mRNA vaccine experiment

The invention of this new disease label demands an urgent and thorough investigation into potential root causes, particularly with the mRNA vaccines, which damage all these organ and endocrine systems of the body. Instead of addressing these critical inquiries, however, mainstream medical discourse appears to be pivoting toward the development of new treatments, positioning pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Merck to benefit significantly from this shift. In fact, Pfizer has already begun acquiring drug companies to profit from chronic diseases caused by their own COVID-19 “vaccines.”

While the AHA’s new classification of CKM syndrome could lead to advancements in treatment, there is a conspicuous lack of emphasis on prevention or root cause analysis. Instead, the focus is on managing symptoms and prescribing patented medications — a stark contrast to the traditional adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Shouldn’t medical authorities be asking basic questions about the sudden emergence of a new medical condition that impacts nearly an entire population? Slapping a new label on most Americans doesn’t fix the problem, but it does set individuals up to be patients for life, while covering up the root causes.

The disconnection between diagnosis and proactive healthcare solutions raises critical ethical concerns. As the medical community gears up for potential profit-driven initiatives surrounding CKM syndrome, the question looms: Is genuine healthcare the priority, or merely the expansion of a corporate healthcare model that prioritizes the lifelong drugging of patients over prevention and addressing root causes?

Sources include:

• Armageddonepose.substack.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com
• NaturalNews.com

Plasmids, which are used in the manufacturing process for vaccines, carry genetic material that can inadvertently enter the human body through vaccination. Plasmids can disrupt cellular functions or contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. These fragments have the potential to integrate into the DNA of vaccinated individuals, potentially disrupting the function of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. One troubling aspect is the inclusion of sequences from the SV40 virus, known for its cancer-causing properties. The implications of such contamination are dire, with experts warning of the potential for permanent genetic changes in vaccine recipients.

This serious safety concern necessitates that ALL recombinant vaccines be investigated for DNA contamination. The current findings on DNA contamination across the vaccine supply are startling, and warrant an audit into the manufacturing processes of vaccines, including investigations into the role adjuvants and lipid nanoparticles play in facilitating the DNA contamination of human cells.

Australia taking DNA contamination of COVID vaccines seriously now

The Port Hedland council in Australia recently passed a motion recognizing “unacceptable levels of plasmid DNA contamination” in mRNA COVID vaccines. The motion, which also mandated the dissemination of this information to health practitioners and vaccine recipients, represents a significant shift in how vaccine safety concerns are addressed. Given Port Hedland’s economic significance in Australia, this council’s decision is likely to have far-reaching implications. For the first time, health practitioners are being formally alerted to the dangers posed by plasmid contamination — a topic that has been heavily suppressed since the #plasmidgate controversy surfaced in early 2023.

Adjuvants in Gardasil vaccine may facilitate plasmids into teenagers

Compounding the controversy is a recent exposé written by investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi. The exposé reveals similar issues with the Gardasil HPV vaccine. The report highlights the FDA’s awareness of residual plasmid DNA in Gardasil, a contamination concern that dates back to 2011. This is an issue that has been blacklisted from vaccine safety discussions in the media and between government regulators.

This DNA contamination is made more dangerous due to the use of adjuvants in vaccines. The adjuvant is added to vaccines to enhance the immune response. One of the most common adjuvants – aluminum salts – technically act as a transfection agent, allowing foreign DNA to enter the cytoplasm of human immune cells, which then circulate throughout the body. The implications of this toxic facilitation are profound; the introduction of lab-derived plasmids into the human body poses significant risks, including the potential for cancer and other genetic diseases.

Antigen levels and body weight/blood volume of vaccine recipient are important factors

COVID-19 vaccines use lipid nanoparticles which facilitate the entry of plasmid DNA into human cells. The Novavax vaccine contains a saponin adjuvant that has similar risks as the lipid nanoparticles. A Hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B), used in newborn babies, contains both aluminum hydroxide and polysorbate 20. These ingredients act as transfection agents, potentially facilitating plasmids into the baby and setting the stage for childhood cancer.

Moreover, a greater quantity of antigen has a greater chance of introducing plasmids into human cells. Conversely, the DNA contamination could have more pronounced effects on babies with a lower blood volume and body weight. The Engerix vaccine (injected into babies) contains 20 micrograms of antigen, whereas the Gardasil HPV vaccine (injected into teenagers) contains 270 micrograms. The dosage of the antigen is important, as well as the blood volume and weight of the person being injected.

The HPV vaccine contains 13 times more foreign proteins and DNA than the Hep B vaccines. Essentially, the HPV vaccines is equivalent to 13 injections of the Hep vaccine, in terms of antigen quantity. Still, the Hep B vaccine is given to infants, not teenagers, and therefore introduces a disproportionate level of contamination to a baby with lower blood volume and body weight. Both vaccines pose serious DNA contamination risks on two different ends of the exposure spectrum.

All vaccines utilize a risky transfection process using adjuvants

Essential to the function of a vaccine is the term “transfection.” This process allows foreign genetic material to enter human cells — a mechanism that typically doesn’t occur naturally. Human cells possess protective barriers that prevent the uptake of foreign nucleic acids. However, laboratory techniques have been developed to bypass these defenses. The main methods of transfection include:

• Mechanical Disruption: Physically puncturing the cell membrane to allow DNA entry
• Chemical Facilitation: Utilizing chemicals that mimic essential cellular components, acting like a Trojan horse to transport DNA into the cell
• Electroporation: Applying an electric field to create temporary pores in the cell membrane, though this method is less practical for widespread human use

Among these, chemical agents are the most viable for introducing nucleic acids into cells. Commonly used transfection agents include cationic particles, which are positively charged and attract the negatively charged components of cell membranes. Detergents can also disrupt membranes, enabling the entry of nucleic acids. The concern surrounding the use of lab-reagent plasmids is significant. These plasmids can contain nucleotides that may lead to severe genetic consequences, including cancer, if transferred into human cells. When a transfection agent is present, the likelihood of this transfer increases substantially.

While many are familiar with standard transfection agents like lipids (lipofectamine, lipid nanoparticles) and calcium phosphate, a broader range of substances can act as transfection agents. Here are some less commonly recognized ones:

• Polysorbate: A surfactant/emulsifier that can enhance transfection
• Metallic Cations: Elements such as aluminum, zirconium, and cerium, known for their positive charge and transfection efficiency
• Saponins: Soaps used as adjuvants in certain vaccines, promoting transfection
• Histidine: A positively charged amino acid that can aid in the transfection process

Understanding the toxicity potential of these transfection agents is crucial, especially in light of their implications for causing cancer in children, teenagers, and adults.

Sources include:

• NaturalNews.com
• ArkMedic.info [1]
• ArkMedic.info [2]
• Blog.MaryAnneDemasi.substack.com
• Public4PageFreezer.com

Geoengineering can be used as a weapon

In recent years, the concept of chemtrails, geoengineering, and weather modification has shifted from the fringes of conspiracy theory into mainstream conversation. With the U.S. government’s revealing its “Five Year Geoengineering Study Plan,” and the USDA’s detailed report on cloud seeding, it is becoming increasingly clear that weather modification is not merely theoretical; it is a reality.

Weather modification (cloud seeding) has been used in the past to increase rainfall totals, and experiments have been conducted to alter the paths of storms. Historically, the U.S. military has used weather modification against foreign enemies. Are current hurricanes influenced by weather modification from corporate, multinational business interests, or perhaps government operations, foreign or domestic? Are forces of evil using weather modification to harm Americans?

The lack of widespread discourse around geoengineering raises alarms. U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and others have voiced concerns over governmental control of weather, calling for increased scrutiny of all entities involved in these weather modification programs.

Cloud seeding has been used for nefarious reasons in the past

Cloud seeding, the most common form of geoengineering, involves releasing substances such as silver iodide and potassium iodide into the atmosphere to encourage precipitation. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) describes the process as one that disrupts natural cloud evolution to artificially create rain. On their website, they detail the nine types of weather modification, which does include ionization and lasers.

As of April, there are 42 operational cloud seeding projects across the U.S., with plans for an additional 200 stations by next season, driven by stakeholders from agriculture to insurance companies seeking to mitigate weather-related losses. The North American Weather Modification Council notes that a variety of entities, including municipal governments and private corporations, engage in cloud seeding. Weather modification can also be used to divert precipitation away from certain areas. One company in England sells pricey cloud seeding services to wealthy couples to ensure they get perfect weather on their wedding day.

Historically, cloud seeding has been used for nefarious purposes, like the U.S. military’s Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War. This covert program aimed to extend monsoon seasons over strategic routes, severely disrupting enemy supply lines through artificially induced flooding. The Pentagon later deemed these operations “outstandingly successful,” despite their collateral damage to civilians and military personnel alike.

An example of geoengineering that had unintended consequences is Project Cirrus in 1947. This geoengineering operation dispersed large amounts of dry ice into the clouds to encourage precipitation. The idea was to stimulate the formation of ice crystals, which could then lead to rain. The project stalled the hurricane temporarily but inadvertently redirected the hurricane into Georgia.

For decades, the federal government has claimed that geoengineering is a conspiracy theory; however, in recent years, the government has come clean about these operations and now promotes them as a way to “combat climate change.” Now that these experiments are out in the open, concerns about safety, ethics and public oversight have arisen.

Prominent environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr. argues that powerful figures, including Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum, have “hijacked geoengineering” to further agendas that prioritize social control rather than genuine solutions to environmental challenges. “They aggravate the problem then sell us the solution,” Kennedy asserts, highlighting the potential risks of unchecked technological interventions.

Internationally, over 52 countries are actively engaged in weather modification programs, raising concerns about the geopolitical ramifications of such technologies. Nations like China and Russia have developed advanced capabilities for altering weather, potentially using these techniques as tools of hybrid warfare.

For a more detailed look into weather modification over the decades, read the The Gateway Pundit’s latest deep dive into the issue.

Sources include:

• TheGatewayPundit.com
• CleanTechnica.com
• ARS.USDA.gov
• X.com
• Library.NOAA.gov
• NawMC.org
• OliversTravels.com
• Gizmodo.com
• EarthMagazine.org
• Forbes.com
• Brighteon.com

One of the main organizers of the event – Calley Means – urged the Senate to rethink nutritional guidance and distrust almost every institution.

America’s institutions have lied to the public for decades, misleading people on nutrition, healing from chronic illness

Means, a former consultant for Big Food and Big Pharma, emphasized the need for skepticism regarding the advice offered by major institutions on nutrition and chronic diseases. “Life expectancy has not increased in the past century, and we spend 90 to 95% of all medical spending on chronic issues, yet outcomes remain stagnant,” Means stated.

Means highlighted alarming trends, noting, “Heart disease has risen with increased statin prescriptions. Type 2 diabetes has surged alongside metformin use, and ADHD diagnoses have also climbed as more Adderall is prescribed.” He further pointed out that rising rates of depression and suicide correlate with increased prescriptions of antidepressants, while opioid prescriptions have led to greater pain management challenges.

Means criticized the American food system, describing it as “weaponized” due to the influence of the processed food industry. He traced its origins back to the tobacco industry, stating that major cigarette companies strategically acquired food brands and applied their expertise in creating addictive products. “They moved addiction specialists into their food divisions, creating ultra-processed foods designed to be both palatable and addictive,” he explained. Food chemicals such as MSG are used to addict consumers to toxic food-like products that are void of nutrition. Consumers get accustomed to eating ultra-processed foods that do not provide their cells what’s necessary to carry out vital functions.

Means asserted that the standard American diet has not only contributed to public health crises but has also been financially beneficial for the healthcare industry, which profits from treating the chronic conditions stemming from poor nutrition. “The medical industry has been complicit in this issue, benefiting from the rise in chronic diseases,” Means added. It’s true: most of the new drugs manufactured today do not address the root cause of chronic disease. Many of the new drugs actually cause new health problems.

Ultra-processed, food-like items have replaced raw living foods and herbs that people need to thrive

Max Lugavere, a best-selling author and long-time advocate for nutritional awareness, echoed these sentiments. He warned that many items in grocery stores should not be considered food but rather “food-like items” that contribute to an obesity epidemic. “This isn’t just about willpower; it’s about our food system,” Lugavere asserted. He concluded with a poignant observation: “We are not simply living longer; we are dying longer, plagued by preventable illnesses.”

The discussions at the Senate roundtable were deeply distrustful of government guidelines like the USDA’s food pyramid, which ignores essential food groups such as herbs, seeds, roots, barks, berries, seaweeds and healthy fats, to name a few. As health education is dumbed down in school systems and in medical schools, there is growing concern about the effectiveness of current nutritional guidance and chronic disease management strategies. As chronic diseases surface, individuals are finding their own way out of these health struggles by researching and implementing holistic strategies that are dismissed by traditional allopathic doctors — most of which are not trained on nutrition and herbal medicine.

As the panelists called for a re-evaluation of institutional advice, they highlighted the urgent need for systemic change in America’s approach to health and nutrition. Food pantries are void of the raw, living foods, nutrient-dense superfoods, adaptogenic substances and medicinal herbs that can set people free from their chronic diseases.

Sources include:

• Lifesitenews.com
• Rumble.com
• DietaryGuidelines.gov [PDF]
• Naturalpedia.com