(Natural News)—The recent recommendation by the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) to approve Kostaive, a self-replicating mRNA (saRNA) vaccine, marks a troubling escalation in the pharmaceutical industry’s push to deploy untested and potentially hazardous technologies on the global population. This decision, which now rests with the European Commission, raises serious concerns about the erosion of health freedom, government transparency, and the prioritization of corporate profits over public safety.

Self-replicating mRNA vaccines, such as Kostaive, are not merely another iteration of traditional mRNA technology. They represent a radical departure from conventional vaccines, introducing a mechanism that allows the injected mRNA to replicate within the body, akin to a viral infection. This “biological printing press” could theoretically amplify the vaccine’s presence and effects indefinitely, creating a cascade of unintended consequences that remain entirely unknown.

The clinical trial data for Kostaive is alarming, to say the least. Across phases 1, 2, and 3a, 90% of participants experienced adverse events after the first dose, with 74.5% reporting systemic reactions and 15.2% requiring medical attention. Five deaths were reported in the phase 3b study alone. These figures are not just statistics; they are human lives and health outcomes being sacrificed on the altar of expediency. Yet, despite these red flags, the CHMP has recommended approval, raising questions about the integrity of the regulatory process and the influence of pharmaceutical companies like Arcturus Therapeutics.

What is even more concerning is the lack of long-term safety data for these vaccines. As epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher aptly noted, “These products are completely new. There is absolutely no long-term safety data on them.” The potential for these self-amplifying mRNA vaccines to transform cells, induce cancerous mutations, or trigger autoimmune responses remains unstudied. The absence of comprehensive, independent research is a glaring omission in a decision that will affect millions of lives.

Japan’s approval of the same technology in 2023, with its own troubling adverse event rates, should serve as a cautionary tale. Yet, instead of learning from these experiences, the European Union appears poised to follow suit, prioritizing the interests of Big Pharma over the well-being of its citizens. This is not just a failure of regulatory oversight; it is a betrayal of public trust.

Self-replication destroys health freedom, bodily autonomy

The implications of self-replicating mRNA vaccines extend far beyond the immediate risks to individual health. These vaccines represent a dangerous precedent in the ongoing consolidation of power by pharmaceutical corporations and captured regulatory agencies. The lack of transparency, the suppression of dissenting voices, and the disregard for genuine safety concerns are all part of a broader pattern of control that threatens health freedom and democratic governance.

Moreover, the potential for these vaccines to be used as tools for population control cannot be ignored. The ability to inject self-replicating genetic material into the human body raises ethical questions that go to the heart of what it means to be free. Once these technologies are approved, the door is opened to further experimentation, with little regard for the long-term consequences.

The European Commission must reject this recommendation and halt the approval of Kostaive and similar self-replicating mRNA vaccines. The risks far outweigh the benefits, and the lack of long-term safety data renders this technology unfit for human use. Instead of rushing to embrace untested and dangerous innovations, regulators should prioritize the health and well-being of their citizens, conducting rigorous, independent studies and ensuring that any new vaccine meets the highest standards of safety and efficacy.

As natural health professionals, we stand firm in our conviction that health freedom is a fundamental human right. The approval of self-replicating mRNA vaccines would not only jeopardize this right but also set a dangerous precedent for future medical interventions. It is time for governments and regulatory agencies to listen to the voices of scientists, health professionals, and citizens who demand transparency, accountability, and genuine protection of public health. The future of health freedom depends on it.

Sources include:

• TheExpose.com
• Nature.com
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• NaturalNews.com

Latest study calls for moratorium on COVID-19 gene therapy

The study, led by Philip R. Oldfield, Ph.D., and authored by renowned epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, scrutinizes the safety and regulatory oversight of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. McCullough, who rightfully opposed the COVID-19 vaccine from the beginning, said the vaccine should never have been classified as a traditional vaccine, but rather as gene therapy — a category with far more stringent regulatory requirements.

The study emphasizes the failure of the scientific community to conduct essential testing, such as toxicology, carcinogenicity and long-term safety evaluations. Most alarmingly, it points to an unsettling lack of understanding regarding the long-term effects of the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine.

“The truth is becoming more obvious,” said Oldfield in a statement. “As more evidence is accumulating, we are seeing undeniable signs that the risks may far outweigh the benefits of these vaccines.”

The study’s criticism extends beyond the vaccine’s classification. It highlights several key concerns, including the absence of critical testing during clinical trials. Key factors such as the amount and variability of the spike protein produced in vaccine recipients were not measured adequately, and placebo groups were unblinded prematurely, undermining the integrity of long-term safety and efficacy data.

Gene therapy turned out to be genetic weaponry

The study also references a troubling report by the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which shows over 19,000 deaths associated with COVID-19 vaccines, a figure that far surpasses any other vaccine’s adverse events in recent history. This is particularly concerning given the typical thresholds for removing vaccines from the market. For instance, the Rotashield vaccine, linked to just 15 deaths, was swiftly withdrawn. In contrast, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine remains widely available despite a far higher mortality rate in its initial months of use.

The authors argue that the regulatory agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), failed to address these concerns, pointing to a “widespread regulatory capture” that discouraged proper oversight. “Public health agencies could have acted responsibly and issued sound, scientifically-backed recommendations,” said Dr. McCullough. “But instead, they chose to ignore mounting safety signals.”

Recent research has also raised alarms about the neurological risks associated with this genetic weaponry. A study published in Cell Host & Microbe in late November found that the persistent presence of spike proteins in the brain could lead to lasting neurological damage. Experts like Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology, are particularly alarmed by the increasing number of individuals showing signs of severe neurological diseases and rapid dementia following injection.

Dr. McCullough’s study also notes that the spike protein produced by this gene therapy is widely distributed throughout the body and infiltrates vital organs, including the liver, spleen, ovaries and adrenal glands. He warns that no comprehensive studies have been conducted on how this protein interacts with the human body over the long term. This raises concerns about the vaccine’s potential to cause damage to multiple organ systems, especially since the body may continue to produce spike proteins long after injection.

Despite these mounting safety concerns, Pfizer and other manufacturers have been granted legal immunity from liability, making it difficult for injured individuals to seek justice. This liability shield has incentivized vaccine companies to downplay the risks.

How many more voices need to be raised, before this biological weapon system is shut down?

Many experts and organizations are now questioning why the mRNA vaccines are still in use despite these glaring issues. The World Council for Health, Doctors for COVID Ethics and even Florida’s Surgeon General have publicly supported halting the distribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines until more comprehensive safety studies are conducted.

“There is no justification for continuing this gene therapy experiment on a global scale,” said Christof Plothe, D.O., a member of the World Council for Health’s steering committee. “We still don’t know the long-term effects, and we need to stop this rollout immediately.”

As one of the study’s authors put it, “Given all the available evidence, there should be a moratorium on all mRNA injections until we have a clear understanding of their safety profile.”

How many more voices need to be raised, and how much more evidence needs to emerge before we pause the use of these “vaccines” in order to protect public health? When will they be properly classified as genetic weaponry?

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• JPAnds.org [PDF]
• MedAlerts.org
• ChildrensHealthDefense.org [PDF]

A renowned cardiologist and attorney-at-law who works as contributing editor at the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service and consults with LivOn Labs, Levy explained to investigative journalist Steve Kirsch recently how the spike proteins in the injections have a profoundly damaging impact on the human heart.

Kirsch, as you probably know, has been looking into the relationship between COVID jabs and cardiovascular injury for years now. He addressed the heart damage incurred by vaccinated pilots, as one example, this leading to changes in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) official guidelines.

In 2022, the FAA quietly altered its electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters for pilots to accommodate those who suffered cardiac injury. The suggestion with this quiet change is that the shots are responsible for the high number of fully jabbed pilots whose hearts are now destroyed.

“The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots,” Kirsch says about the FAA’s widening of the ECG parameters beyond the normal range. “My best guess right now is that over 50 million Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.”

(Related: Have you checked out this report from Jonathan Landsman about how to avoid the threat of infectious diseases and vaccine damage naturally?)

mRNA spike protein damage

Dr. Levy wrote an essay called “Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common” that discusses many of the issues addressed in the above video interview. Levy is fully aware of the post-injection myocarditis crisis, though he personally has not seen as many affected patients as other clinical cardiologists in his field have.

“Scientific literature indicates that myocarditis is occurring quite frequently in patients harbouring the chronic presence of the covid-related spike protein,” Levy writes.

“This is being seen in many individuals with persistent chronic covid, many of whom have been vaccinated, as well as in a substantial number of individuals who have been vaccinated and have never contracted covid.”

In tests on mice, mRNA injections were clearly shown to produce spike proteins and induce myopericarditis, in turn producing the symptoms now being widely seen in fully jabbed human beings.

“While not yet clearly documented by any well-designed studies in the medical literature, a great deal of anecdotal information indicates that vaccine mRNA shedding can occur,” Levy notes.

“And once transmitted, the mRNA directly leads to spike protein production. Such mRNA shedding means that the spike protein is indirectly, if not directly as well, transmissible from one individual to another via inhalation or various forms of skin contact.”

Though some will argue that the amounts of spike protein “exposure” are too minimal to have any formidable impact, Levy points out that the replication process that occurs inside the injected host causes spike proteins to replicate, resulting in systemic inflammation or worse.

“Myocarditis, which simply means inflammation of some or all of the muscle cells in the heart, can occur when the spike protein binds to the blood vessels in the heart, to the muscle cells themselves, or both,” Levy says.

“Chest X-ray, electrocardiogram (‘ECG’), and echocardiogram can all be used to help establish the diagnosis of myocarditis. An elevated troponin level on blood testing is extremely sensitive in picking up any ongoing heart muscle cell damage, and some elevation of this test will always be seen if any significant inflammation is present in those muscle cells.”

If you are interested in learning more about vaccine damage and how to deal with it, visit ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

• Disswire.com
• NaturalNews.com
• FAA.gov

“Everything was a lie from the beginning. The asymptomatic people don’t transmit. Kids were not harbingers of the disease. They don’t actually, they’re like a break on the disease. Lockdowns were a farce. Masks don’t work,” he said.

He also came up with a colorful way to describe the illusion of masks helping to prevent the spread of the virus, stating: “I tell people, I joke sometimes I say masks do work. A lot like bathing suits work to keep pee out of the pool. They’re not very effective. So that’s one of those things that, you know, it was a farce. Pretty much everything they said was a farce.

He also spoke out about COVID-19 vaccines, something that has cost some doctors their medical licenses and professional reputations. Even though it has now become painfully obvious that these vaccines are, in many ways, as dangerous as a lot of us originally feared, the topic is still largely taboo among medical professionals when speaking on the record.

Dr. Urso said: “Well if you want to destroy your immune system, take a COVID-19 vaccine. It will destroy your immune system. It distributes widely in your body. It can’t be broken down because it’s a genetically modified RNA. There are contaminants, process related impurities, what I usually call them, but contaminants for most people, that they haven’t gotten out of the vaccines.”

He also drew attention to problems linked to the vaccines, such heart attacks, strokes and cancer, quoting a statistic that there were 40% more deaths in 2021 among the 18-to-64 age range after the rollout of the jabs.

In addition, he explained how the design of the vaccines is inherently flawed and they are capable of distributing their contaminants and impurities to the brain, ovaries, testes and bone marrow.

And unlike many of the doctors who are talking about this now but weren’t nearly as forthcoming a few years ago, Dr. Urso has been saying these things all along. He drew the ire of the establishment when he made comments on social media during the pandemic promoting the use of hydroxycloroquine (HCQ). He also expressed doubts about the efficacy of masks and appeared on Fox News discussing his views. In addition, he appeared at events with the group of physicians known as America’s Frontline Doctors, who shared information with the public about how they can treat the virus with alternative solutions like vitamins and HCQ.

Doctor was subject of medical board complaint after prescribing HCQ to COVID-19 patients

In 2020, the Texas Medical Board dismissed a complaint against him over his prescription of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients. The medical board concluded that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove he violated the Medical Practice Act, and their investigation revealed that he was “appropriate in his care and treatment” of his patients.

Although the board did not specifically mention HCQ in its letter, Dr. Urso had previously claimed that he had been reported to them for using the drug for COVID-19 patients. It is not known who filed the complaint against him.

This type of smear campaign was common when the vaccines came out and was used as a way to discredit those who had the courage to go against government narratives and Big Pharma and point out the potential problems with injecting our bodies with untested vaccines.

Sources for this article include:

• TheBurningPlatform.com
• MedPageToday.com

Confidential Pfizer documents leaked by Project Veritas show that Big Pharma had “evidence that suggests patients who received a (COVID-19) vaccine are at an increased risk of myocarditis.”

Meanwhile, heavily redacted CDC documents obtained by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request indicate that the agency provided an undercounted figure of post-COVID-19 vaccination myocarditis cases to Israel’s Ministry of Health in early 2021.

The latest revelations come as Germany, Japan and other governments are raising questions about the significant numbers of severe adverse events recorded in individuals following the administration of the vaccines.

“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents, but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis,” said Dr. Brian Hooker, CHD’s chief scientific officer. “It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”

The Pfizer vaccine provided children and teens in England with only about 14 to 15 weeks of protection against the virus, as per a preprint study of over 1.7 million children ages five to 15.

Moreover, researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens, also found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children. The study found that vaccinated children required slightly fewer emergency room visits and hospital stays, but that those outcomes were extremely rare in children and teens across all groups.

COVID-19 vaccine provides almost no benefit to children, study reveals

Public health agencies in the United Kingdom and the U.S. granted authorization to the Pfizer vaccines based on clinical trials that measured immunogenicity and efficacy against infection.

Their research confirmed that even in 2021, when the vaccine was first authorized for children and teens, that age group did not face a high risk for COVID-19-related serious outcomes, including death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization or critical care.

The researchers tested the effectiveness of the first vaccine dose versus no vaccine and of two doses versus a single dose. They matched each vaccinated child with an unvaccinated one, and participants were matched by age, sex, region, prior COVID-19 testing and childhood vaccination status.

Of the 1,262,784 children in the adolescent part of the study, vaccinated and unvaccinated, there were only 72 emergency room visits, 90 COVID-19 hospitalizations and no deaths. There were nine cases of pericarditis and three cases of myocarditis, all in the vaccinated group.

Among all of the children in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group, there were no emergency visits, only six hospitalizations and no deaths related to COVID-19. There were three cases of pericarditis, all in vaccinated children.

The researchers concluded that in adolescents, the vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalization more than it increased the risk for myocarditis and pericarditis, but for children, the increased risk of pericarditis was higher than the reduction of risk for hospitalization.

Visit VaccineInjury.news for similar stories. Watch this video featuring a discussion on COVID accountability. This video is from the Sanivan channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• Brighteon.com

According to TMZ:

Taylor’s husband didn’t provide a cause of death, but noted the plan is for her organs to be donated. He signed off by saying they weren’t able to financially prepare for the hardship that would come with her passing — linking to a GoFundMe for fans who are able to help.

Back in August, Taylor addressed the medical issues she had been facing — telling her followers she felt like she’s been “fighting for my life every day” … saying she was going through indescribable pain, sometimes wishing she was dead.

Deaths such as these have become more common since the rollout of the Covid-19 injections. While there is no way to know if she was “vaccinated” or if the jabs contributed to her death, it’s a question that is always worth asking. Corporate media certainly never asks.